Back in the day, after buying 'Skinner 2nd Ed', this was the second moth guide that I bought ....
  Apparently 'Pyralid' is derived from the Latin pyralis (which in turn appears
  to be derived from the Greek pyr = fire). Pyralis was a fly fabled to have
  lived in fire; perhaps an allusion to moths heading towards candles / torches?
  Either way some of the species in this group are real crackers (though not
  necessarily any of those featured here).
    Whilst it is a diverse group with a number of sub-families, there were all
    Pyralidae back then. Not now; the group has been split into two families, Pyralidae and Crambidae. I've been happily snapping just about anything that
    sits still by the trap for long enough over the last few weeks, whilst
    looking for interesting non-leps, and realise I've ended up with a number of
    photos of various common 'Pyralids' - a good opportunity to actually check
    which family some of these are in and to overload your screen with far too many images for one blog post.
  I'll start with species that are still within the Pyralidae:
  Bee Moth
  Gold Triangle
  Endotricha flammealis
  Phycita roborella
  Acrobasis consociella
  Acrobasis advenella
  Euzophera pinguis
  Homeosoma sinuella
  Rhodophaea formosa
  And the following are all within the Crambidae ....
  Eudonia lacustrata
  Eudonia mercurella
  Chrysoteuchia culmella
  Crambus pascuella
  Agriphila straminella
  Catoptria pinella
  Water Veneer (female)
  Small China-mark (male)
  Small China-mark (female)
  Ringed China-mark (male)
  Ringed China-mark (female)
  Pyrausta aurata
  Anania perlucidalis
  Udea prunalis
  Mother of Pearl
  
    It doesn't take a genius to see that there are moths within both families
    that have similar shapes, eg why is a Gold Triangle a Pyralid and yet Udea
    prunalis is a Crambid. I'm sure it makes sense genetically ....
  
  
























 
 
3 comments:
I hate the new taxonomy. That's all I feel the need to say on the subject.
Super images, very useful as well as I have some of these from Arran to ID. I do have that book as well, although I've never really used it, I probably ought to get it out as the variety of Scoparia/Eudonia things there that were confusing me (not hard) were quite large.
Have a look at Scoparia subfuscsa.
Post a Comment