Back in the day, after buying 'Skinner 2nd Ed', this was the second moth guide that I bought ....
Apparently 'Pyralid' is derived from the Latin pyralis (which in turn appears
to be derived from the Greek pyr = fire). Pyralis was a fly fabled to have
lived in fire; perhaps an allusion to moths heading towards candles / torches?
Either way some of the species in this group are real crackers (though not
necessarily any of those featured here).
Whilst it is a diverse group with a number of sub-families, there were all
Pyralidae back then. Not now; the group has been split into two families, Pyralidae and Crambidae. I've been happily snapping just about anything that
sits still by the trap for long enough over the last few weeks, whilst
looking for interesting non-leps, and realise I've ended up with a number of
photos of various common 'Pyralids' - a good opportunity to actually check
which family some of these are in and to overload your screen with far too many images for one blog post.
I'll start with species that are still within the Pyralidae:
Bee Moth
Gold Triangle
Endotricha flammealis
Phycita roborella
Acrobasis consociella
Acrobasis advenella
Euzophera pinguis
Homeosoma sinuella
Rhodophaea formosa
And the following are all within the Crambidae ....
Eudonia lacustrata
Eudonia mercurella
Chrysoteuchia culmella
Crambus pascuella
Agriphila straminella
Catoptria pinella
Water Veneer (female)
Small China-mark (male)
Small China-mark (female)
Ringed China-mark (male)
Ringed China-mark (female)
Pyrausta aurata
Anania perlucidalis
Udea prunalis
Mother of Pearl
It doesn't take a genius to see that there are moths within both families
that have similar shapes, eg why is a Gold Triangle a Pyralid and yet Udea
prunalis is a Crambid. I'm sure it makes sense genetically ....
3 comments:
I hate the new taxonomy. That's all I feel the need to say on the subject.
Super images, very useful as well as I have some of these from Arran to ID. I do have that book as well, although I've never really used it, I probably ought to get it out as the variety of Scoparia/Eudonia things there that were confusing me (not hard) were quite large.
Have a look at Scoparia subfuscsa.
Post a Comment